Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oncologist Participation and Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.
Patel, Vishal R; Cwalina, Thomas B; Gupta, Arjun; Nortjé, Nico; Mullangi, Samyukta; Parikh, Ravi B; Shih, Ya-Chen Tina; Hussaini, S M Qasim.
Afiliação
  • Patel VR; Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Cwalina TB; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Gupta A; Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
  • Nortjé N; Section of Clinical Ethics, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Mullangi S; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Parikh RB; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Shih YT; Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
  • Hussaini SMQ; Section of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Oncologist ; 28(4): e228-e232, 2023 04 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847139
ABSTRACT
The merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) is a value-based payment model created by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to promote high-value care through performance-based adjustments of Medicare reimbursements. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the participation and performance of oncologists in the 2019 MIPS. Oncologist participation was low (86%) compared to all-specialty participation (97%). After adjusting for practice characteristics, higher MIPS scores were observed among oncologists with alternative payment models (APMs) as their filing source (mean score, 91 for APMs vs. 77.6 for individuals; difference, 13.41 [95% CI, 12.21, 14.6]), indicating the importance of greater organizational resources for participants. Lower scores were associated with greater patient complexity (mean score, 83.4 for highest quintile vs. 84.9 for lowest quintile, difference, -1.43 [95% CI, -2.48, -0.37]), suggesting the need for better risk-adjustment by CMS. Our findings may guide future efforts to improve oncologist engagement in MIPS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Oncologistas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Oncologistas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article