Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the readability of online testosterone search results.
Pominville, Raymond; Tay, Kimberly; Callegari, Michael; Pei, Evonne; Sarica, Erhan; Jesse, Erin; Prunty, Megan; Loeb, Aram; Thirumavalavan, Nannan; Ghayda, Ramy Abou.
Afiliação
  • Pominville R; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Tay K; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. kimberly.tay@uhhospitals.org.
  • Callegari M; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Pei E; Case Western Reserve University College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Sarica E; Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Tulsa, OK, USA.
  • Jesse E; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Prunty M; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Loeb A; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Thirumavalavan N; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Ghayda RA; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Int J Impot Res ; 2023 Mar 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864203
ABSTRACT
With the budding interest in testosterone therapy (TTh), online health information plays a significant role in patients' health care decisions. Therefore, we evaluated the source and readability of web-based information available to patients regarding TTh on Google. From Google search terms "Testosterone Therapy" and "Testosterone Replacement", 77 unique sources were identified. Sources were categorized as Academic, Commercial, Institutional, or Patient Support, then evaluated using validated readability and English language text assessment tools the Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch Kincade, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index and Automated Readability index. The average grade level for understanding academic sources was 16 (college senior); commercial, institutional, and patient support sources were 13 (college freshman); 8 and 5 grade levels, respectively, above the average U.S. adult. Patient support sources were most prevalent, while commercial sources were the least at 35 and 14%, respectively. The average reading ease score was 36.8, indicative of difficult-to-read material overall. These results indicate that the most immediate online sources for TTh information exceed the average reading level of most adults within the U.S., hence more effort should be taken to publish accessible and readable material to improve patient health literacy.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article