Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of Neck or Back Pain in Ambulatory Care: Did Visit Mode or the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Provider Practice or Patient Adherence?
Roblin, Douglas W; Goodrich, Glenn K; Davis, Teaniese L; Gander, Jennifer C; McCracken, Courtney E; Weinfield, Nancy S; Ritzwoller, Debra P.
Afiliação
  • Roblin DW; Kaiser Permanente, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Rockville, MD.
  • Goodrich GK; Kaiser Permanente, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO.
  • Davis TL; Kaiser Permanente, Center for Research and Evaluation, Atlanta, GA.
  • Gander JC; Kaiser Permanente, Center for Research and Evaluation, Atlanta, GA.
  • McCracken CE; Kaiser Permanente, Center for Research and Evaluation, Atlanta, GA.
  • Weinfield NS; Kaiser Permanente, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Rockville, MD.
  • Ritzwoller DP; Kaiser Permanente, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO.
Med Care ; 61(Suppl 1): S30-S38, 2023 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893416
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE:

In recent years, 2 circumstances have changed provider-patient interactions in ambulatory care (1) the replacement of virtual for in-person visits and (2) the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the potential impact of each event on provider practice and patient adherence by comparing the frequency of the association of provider orders, and patient fulfillment of those orders, by visit mode and pandemic period, for incident neck or back pain (NBP) visits in ambulatory care.

METHODS:

Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 3 Kaiser Permanente regions (Colorado, Georgia, and Mid-Atlantic States) from January 2017 to June 2021. Incident NBP visits were defined from ICD-10 coded as primary or first listed diagnoses on adult, family medicine, or urgent care visits separated by at least 180 days. Visit modes were classified as virtual or in-person. Periods were classified as prepandemic (before April 2020 or the beginning of the national emergency) or recovery (after June 2020). Percentages of provider orders for, and patient fulfillment of orders, were measured for 5 service classes and compared on virtual versus in-person visits, and prepandemic versus recovery periods. Comparisons were balanced on patient case-mix using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS:

Ancillary services in all 5 categories at each of the 3 Kaiser Permanente regions were substantially ordered less frequently on virtual compared with in-person visits in both the prepandemic and recovery periods (both P ≤ 0.001). Conditional on an order, patient fulfillment within 30 days was high (typically ≥70%) and not likely meaningfully different between visit modes or pandemic periods.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ancillary services for incident NBP visits were ordered less frequently during virtual than in-person visits in both prepandemic and recovery periods. Patient fulfillment of orders was high, and not significantly different by mode or period.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / COVID-19 Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / COVID-19 Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article