Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Leg-Length Discrepancy Variability on Standard Anteroposterior Pelvis Radiographs: An Analysis Using Deep Learning Measurements.
Jang, Seong Jun; Kunze, Kyle N; Bornes, Troy D; Anderson, Christopher G; Mayman, David J; Jerabek, Seth A; Vigdorchik, Jonathan M; Sculco, Peter K.
Afiliação
  • Jang SJ; Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Kunze KN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Bornes TD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Anderson CG; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Commonwealth Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Mayman DJ; Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Jerabek SA; Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Vigdorchik JM; Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Sculco PK; Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(10): 2017-2023.e3, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is a critical factor in component selection and placement for total hip arthroplasty. However, LLD radiographic measurements are subject to variation based on the femoral/pelvic landmarks chosen. This study leveraged deep learning (DL) to automate LLD measurements on pelvis radiographs and compared LLD based on several anatomically distinct landmarks.

METHODS:

Patients who had baseline anteroposterior pelvis radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included. A DL algorithm was created to identify LLD-relevant landmarks (ie, teardrop (TD), obturator foramen, ischial tuberosity, greater and lesser trochanters) and measure LLD accurately using six landmark combinations. The algorithm was then applied to automate LLD measurements in the entire cohort of patients. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess agreement between different LLD methods.

RESULTS:

The DL algorithm measurements were first validated in an independent cohort for all six LLD methods (ICC = 0.73-0.98). Images from 3,689 patients (22,134 LLD measurements) were measured in 133 minutes. When using the TD and lesser trochanter landmarks as the standard LLD method, only measuring LLD using the TD and greater trochanter conferred acceptable agreement (ICC = 0.72). When comparing all six LLD methods for agreement, no combination had an ICC>0.90. Only two (13%) combinations had an ICC>0.75 and eight (53%) combinations had a poor ICC (<0.50).

CONCLUSION:

We leveraged DL to automate LLD measurements in a large patient cohort and found considerable variation in LLD based on the pelvic/femoral landmark selection. This emphasizes the need for the standardization of landmarks for both research and surgical planning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article