Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives.
Merenstein, Daniel; Pot, Bruno; Leyer, Gregory; Ouwehand, Arthur C; Preidis, Geoffrey A; Elkins, Christopher A; Hill, Colin; Lewis, Zachery T; Shane, Andi L; Zmora, Niv; Petrova, Mariya I; Collado, Maria Carmen; Morelli, Lorenzo; Montoya, Gina A; Szajewska, Hania; Tancredi, Daniel J; Sanders, Mary Ellen.
Afiliação
  • Merenstein D; Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC USA.
  • Pot B; Yakult Europe BV, Almere, Netherlands.
  • Leyer G; Scientific Affairs, Chr. Hansen, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Ouwehand AC; Global Health & Nutrition Sciences, International Flavors & Fragrances, Kantvik, Finland.
  • Preidis GA; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Elkins CA; Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Hill C; APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Lewis ZT; Synbiotic Health Inc, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  • Shane AL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory Children's Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Zmora N; Scientific consultant, Elinav Lab, Immunology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Petrova MI; Winclove Probiotics B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Collado MC; Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
  • Morelli L; Department of Food Science and Technology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
  • Montoya GA; Department of Chemical Risk Assessment, Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Szajewska H; Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Tancredi DJ; Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Sanders ME; International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO, USA.
Gut Microbes ; 15(1): 2185034, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36919522
ABSTRACT
Probiotics are used for both generally healthy consumers and in clinical settings. However, theoretical and proven adverse events from probiotic consumption exist. New probiotic strains and products, as well as expanding use of probiotics into vulnerable populations, warrants concise, and actionable recommendations on how to work toward their safe and effective use. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics convened a meeting to discuss and produce evidence-based recommendations on potential acute and long-term risks, risks to vulnerable populations, the importance for probiotic product quality to match the needs of vulnerable populations, and the need for adverse event reporting related to probiotic use. The importance of whole genome sequencing, which enables determination of virulence, toxin, and antibiotic resistance genes, as well as clear assignment of species and strain identity, is emphasized. We present recommendations to guide the scientific and medical community on judging probiotic safety.
What is the context? Probiotics, available to healthy consumers as both dietary supplements and foods, are also used by some patient populations. The goal of this paper is to determine if any new factors have emerged that would impact current views about probiotic safety for both these populations.What is new? The authors conclude that established practices are sensibly addressing factors important to the safety of traditional probiotics used by the general population. They also make recommendations regarding emerging safety considerations. Probiotics targeted for patient populations should undergo stringent testing to meet quality standards appropriate for that population, preferably verified by an independent third party. The safety of probiotics derived from species without a history of safe use must be considered on a case-by-case basis. Research is needed to address some gaps, for example which best animal models to use for safety assessment of live microbes, the possibility of antibiotic resistance gene transfer via transformation, and potential impact of probiotic-induced changes in microbiomes, interactions with drugs, and probiotic colonization.What is the impact? Probiotics of sufficient quality for patient populations are being developed and should be used accordingly. Long-term safety assessments for probiotics should be consistent with, and not more stringent than, current regulatory requirements for biologic drugs, including fecal microbial transplants. Rigor in collecting and reporting data on adverse events is needed. The authors confirm the need for understanding the entire genetic makeup of a probiotic as a cornerstone for assessing its safety.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Probióticos / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Probióticos / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article