Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect and safety of mesenchymal stem cells for patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Zhang, Zhijing; Shao, Shuai; Liu, Xuefeng; Tong, Zhaohui.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Z; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Shao S; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Liu X; Departments of Pathology, Urology, Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Tong Z; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Med Virol ; 95(4): e28702, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964933
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to assess whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy could offer survival advantages for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, and CNKI was performed from December 1, 2019 to December 25, 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted in this meta analysis. Besides, subgroup analysis and meta-regression was performed using a random-effects model to find the potential sources of heterogeneity. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1073 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, patients in the MSCs groups were associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality (MSCs 18.4% vs. control 25.5%; risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.90; p = 0.004; I² = 0%). For all secondary outcomes, there wasn't significant improvement in the experimental group versus the control group regarding symptom remission rate (53.2%, 201/378 vs. 46.5%, 164/353; RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32; p = 0.05; I² = 43%), but the pooled analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in length of hospital stay (MD -3.82, 95% CI -5.87 to -1.77; p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%), requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.82; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%) and post-CRP level (MD -31.61; 95% CI -46.74 to -16.49; p < 0.0001). Moreover, regarding the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.35-1.52; p = 0.39; I² = 44%) and serious adverse events (sAEs) (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p = 0.73; I² = 39%), no significant differences were observed between MSCs and control groups. The TSA analysis showed that the result of all-cause mortality might be false-positive result. Based on the pooled results in this study, compared with standard treatment, MSCs therapy may reduce all-cause mortality of patients with COVID-19 with no increase risk of AEs and sAEs, but may not improve symptom remission rate. Further more high-quality and large-sample RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article