Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fluid Management for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy: An International Survey.
Ledoux-Hutchinson, Lawrence; Wald, Ron; Malbrain, Manu L N G; Carrier, François Martin; Bagshaw, Sean M; Bellomo, Rinaldo; Adhikari, Neill K J; Gallagher, Martin; Silver, Samuel A; Bouchard, Josée; Connor, Michael J; Clark, Edward G; Côté, Jean-Maxime; Neyra, Javier A; Denault, André; Beaubien-Souligny, William.
Afiliação
  • Ledoux-Hutchinson L; Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Wald R; Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Malbrain MLNG; First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
  • Carrier FM; Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel, Belgium.
  • Bagshaw SM; International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium.
  • Bellomo R; Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Adhikari NKJ; Critical Care Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Gallagher M; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Silver SA; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bouchard J; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Connor MJ; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Clark EG; Renal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Côté JM; Division of Nephrology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Neyra JA; Division of Nephrology, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Denault A; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Beaubien-Souligny W; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 18(6): 705-715, 2023 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975194
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In critically ill patients receiving KRT, high ultrafiltration rates and persistent fluid accumulation are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this international survey was to evaluate current practices and evidence gaps related to fluid removal with KRT in critically ill patients.

METHODS:

This was a multinational, web-based survey distributed by seven networks comprising nephrologists and intensivists. Physicians involved in the care of critically ill patients were invited to complete a 39-question survey about fluid management practices on KRT. The survey was distributed from September 2021 to December 2021.

RESULTS:

There were 757 respondents from 96 countries (response rate of 65%). Most respondents practiced adult medicine (89%) and worked in an academic center (69%). The majority (91%) reported aiming for a 0.5- to 2-L negative fluid balance per day when fluid removal is indicated, although there was important variability in what respondents considered a safe maximal target. Intensivists were more likely than nephrologists to use adjunct volume status assessment methods ( i.e. , ultrasound, hemodynamic markers, and intra-abdominal pressure), while nephrologists were more likely to deploy cointerventions aimed at improving tolerance to fluid removal ( i.e. , osmotic agents and low-temperature dialysate). There was a broad consensus that rapid decongestion should be prioritized when fluid accumulation is present, but the prevention of hypotension was also reported as a competing priority. A majority (77%) agreed that performing trials that compare fluid management strategies would be ethical and clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have identified multiple areas of variability in current practice of fluid management for patients receiving KRT. Most nephrologists and intensivists agreed that several knowledge gaps related to fluid removal strategies should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article