Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Same-session double EUS-guided bypass versus surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy: an international multicenter comparison.
Bronswijk, Michiel; Vanella, Giuseppe; van Wanrooij, Roy L J; Samanta, Jayanta; Lauwereys, Jonas; Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique; Dell'Anna, Giuseppe; Dhar, Jahnvi; Gupta, Vikas; van Malenstein, Hannah; Laleman, Wim; Jaekers, Joris; Topal, Halit; Topal, Baki; Crippa, Stefano; Falconi, Massimo; Besselink, Marc G; Messaoudi, Nouredin; Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio; Kunda, Rastislav; Van der Merwe, Schalk.
Afiliação
  • Bronswijk M; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Vanella G; Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division.
  • van Wanrooij RLJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Samanta J; Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
  • Lauwereys J; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E; Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP, Centre, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Dell'Anna G; Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division.
  • Dhar J; Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
  • Gupta V; Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
  • van Malenstein H; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
  • Laleman W; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
  • Jaekers J; Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Topal H; Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Topal B; Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Crippa S; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy.
  • Falconi M; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy.
  • Besselink MG; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Messaoudi N; Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Arcidiacono PG; Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division.
  • Kunda R; Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Van der Merwe S; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 98(2): 225-236.e1, 2023 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990124
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Gastric outlet and biliary obstruction are common manifestations of GI malignancies and some benign diseases for which standard treatment would be surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy (ie, "double bypass"). Therapeutic EUS has allowed for the creation of an EUS-guided double bypass. However, same-session double EUS-guided bypass has only been described in small proof-of-concept series and lacks a comparison with surgical double bypass.

METHODS:

A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed of all consecutive same-session double EUS-guided bypass procedures performed in 5 academic centers. Surgical comparators were extracted from these centers' databases from the same time interval. Efficacy, safety, hospital stay, nutrition and chemotherapy resumption, long-term patency, and survival were compared.

RESULTS:

Of 154 identified patients, 53 (34.4%) received treatment with EUS and 101 (65.6%) with surgery. At baseline, patients undergoing EUS exhibited higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores and a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (9.0 [interquartile range {IQR}, 7.0-10.0] vs 7.0 [IQR, 5.0-9.0], P < .001). Technical success (96.2% vs 100%, P = .117) and clinical success rates (90.6% vs 82.2%, P = .234) were similar when comparing EUS and surgery. Overall (11.3% vs 34.7%, P = .002) and severe adverse events (3.8% vs 19.8%, P = .007) occurred more frequently in the surgical group. In the EUS group, median time to oral intake (0 days [IQR, 0-1] vs 6 days [IQR, 3-7], P < .001) and hospital stay (4.0 days [IQR, 3-9] vs 13 days [IQR, 9-22], P < .001) were significantly shorter.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite being used in a patient population with more comorbidities, same-session double EUS-guided bypass achieved similar technical and clinical success and was associated with fewer overall and severe adverse events when compared with surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastroenterostomia / Endossonografia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastroenterostomia / Endossonografia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article