Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment.
Bianchi, Lorenzo; Ceci, Francesco; Balestrazzi, Eleonora; Costa, Francesco; Droghetti, Matteo; Piazza, Pietro; Pissavini, Alessandro; Presutti, Massimiliano; Farolfi, Andrea; Mei, Riccardo; Castellucci, Paolo; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Larcher, Alessandro; Robesti, Daniele; Mottrie, Alexandre; Briganti, Alberto; Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe; Fanti, Stefano; Montorsi, Francesco; Schiavina, Riccardo; Brunocilla, Eugenio.
Afiliação
  • Bianchi L; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Ceci F; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
  • Balestrazzi E; Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
  • Costa F; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  • Droghetti M; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Piazza P; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Pissavini A; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Presutti M; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Farolfi A; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Mei R; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Castellucci P; Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Gandaglia G; Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Larcher A; Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Robesti D; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Mottrie A; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Briganti A; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Morganti AG; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
  • Fanti S; ORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
  • Montorsi F; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Schiavina R; Radiation Oncology Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Brunocilla E; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(7)2023 Mar 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37046687
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients.

METHODS:

we performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease.

RESULTS:

Overall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (p = 0.3). Individuals referred to MDT had significantly higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to those who were treated with the conventional approach (73.5% and 94.7% vs. 30.5% and 79.5%; all p ≤ 0.001). In patients undergoing MDT, no significant differences were found for PFS and MFS according to N1 vs. M1a-b disease, while CRPC-FS estimates were significantly higher in patients with N1 vs. M1a-b (100% vs. 86.1%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analyses, age (HR = 0.96) and ADT during second line salvage treatment (HR = 0.5) were independent predictors of PFS; MDT (HR 0.27) was the only independent predictor of MFS (all p ≤ 0.04)

Conclusion:

Patients who underwent second-line PSMA-guided MDT experienced higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to men who received conventional management.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article