Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Echocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction versus heart failure.
Singam, Narayana Sarma V; Tabi, Meir; Wiley, Brandon; Anavekar, Nandan; Jentzer, Jacob.
Afiliação
  • Singam NSV; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States of America; Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States of Ame
  • Tabi M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
  • Wiley B; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
  • Anavekar N; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
  • Jentzer J; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Int J Cardiol ; 384: 38-47, 2023 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116757
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the prototypical cause of cardiogenic shock (CS), yet CS due to heart failure (HF-CS) is increasingly common. Little is known regarding cardiac function in AMI-CS versus HF-CS. We compared transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings in AMI-CS versus HF-CS and identified predictors of mortality in AMI-CS patients.

METHODS:

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of CS admissions between 2007 and 2018. We compared baseline demographic and TTE parameters in patients with AMI-CS and HF-CS as well as ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-CS versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-CS.

RESULTS:

We included 893 unique patients, including 581 (65%) with AMI-CS. AMI-CS patients were older but had lower illness severity and non-cardiac comorbidity burden. AMI-CS patients had better left ventricular function (LVEF 35% versus 28%), lower biventricular filling pressures, and higher stroke volume versus those with HF-CS. Among TTE measurements, myocardial contraction fraction had the highest discrimination for mortality in AMI-CS (AUC 0.64); AUC values for LVEF and SOFA score were 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. Differences in TTE findings between STEMI-CS versus NSTEMI-CS were modest. There were no significant differences in unadjusted or adjusted in-hospital mortality between AMI-CS and HF-CS (31% versus 35%) or STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS (31% versus 30%) groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with HF-CS and AMI-CS differ in terms of clinical and TTE variables yet have similar prognoses. TTE is useful in determining prognosis of patients admitted with AMI-CS and may allow for early triage and directed therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article