Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparable Short-Term Weight Loss and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients.
Ali, Hassam; Jaber, Fouad; Patel, Pratik; Dahiya, Dushyant Singh; Sarfraz, Shiza; Graham, Saeed; Farooq, Muhammad Fahd; Mohan, Babu P; Adler, Douglas G.
Afiliação
  • Ali H; Department of Gastroenterology, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
  • Jaber F; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
  • Patel P; Department of Gastroenterology, Mather Hospital/Hofstra University Zucker School of Medicine, Port Jefferson, NY, 11777, USA.
  • Dahiya DS; Department of Internal Medicine, Central Michigan College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI, 48601, USA.
  • Sarfraz S; Department of Internal Medicine, Quaid-E-Azam Medical College, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Graham S; Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
  • Farooq MF; Department of Gastroenterology, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
  • Mohan BP; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Adler DG; Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA. dougraham2001@gmail.com.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(6): 2493-2500, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37119378
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a highly effective endo bariatric procedure. Data on outcomes of ESG in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to non-diabetics are limited.

AIMS:

We aim to assess differences in clinical outcomes of ESG in DM patients in North America.

METHODS:

We used the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2021 to identify all DM patients who underwent ESG as the primary procedure for weight loss. A 11 propensity score matched cohort of non-DM patients served as controls. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications were compared and analyzed. Adult patients with Class I obesity and above were included.

RESULTS:

After matching, 310 DM and non-DM patients that underwent ESG were compared. The median % BMI decrease (3.3% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.62) and median total body weight loss (%TBWL) (4.3% vs. 4%, P = 0.75) in 30 days were similar in the DM compared to non-DM cohorts. A similar proportion of patients with major adverse events (AEs) were present after ESG in the DM (1.6% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.74) compared to the non-DM cohort. The DM cohort had more patients with 30-day readmissions (3.2% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.08) than the non-DM cohort. %TBWL was similar in patients with HbA1c < 9% compared to ≥ 9%, (4.3% each, P = 0.33) with comparable AEs.

CONCLUSION:

ESG is a safe procedure in DM patients, without an increase in AEs, and it shows similar short-term weight loss compared to non-DM patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Gastroplastia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Gastroplastia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article