Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stability of mental motor-imagery classification in EEG depends on the choice of classifier model and experiment design, but not on signal preprocessing.
Rosenfelder, Martin Justinus; Spiliopoulou, Myra; Hoppenstedt, Burkhard; Pryss, Rüdiger; Fissler, Patrick; Della Piedra Walter, Mario; Kolassa, Iris-Tatjana; Bender, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Rosenfelder MJ; Institute of Psychology and Education, Clinical and Biological Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Spiliopoulou M; Therapiezentrum Burgau, Burgau, Germany.
  • Hoppenstedt B; Knowledge Management and Discovery Lab, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Pryss R; Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Fissler P; Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Della Piedra Walter M; Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Kolassa IT; Institute of Psychology and Education, Clinical and Biological Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Bender A; Psychiatric Services Thurgau, Münsterlingen, Switzerland.
Front Comput Neurosci ; 17: 1142948, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37180880
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Modern consciousness research has developed diagnostic tests to improve the diagnostic accuracy of different states of consciousness via electroencephalography (EEG)-based mental motor imagery (MI), which is still challenging and lacks a consensus on how to best analyse MI EEG-data. An optimally designed and analyzed paradigm must detect command-following in all healthy individuals, before it can be applied in patients, e.g., for the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness (DOC).

Methods:

We investigated the effects of two important steps in the raw signal preprocessing on predicting participant performance (F1) and machine-learning classifier performance (area-under-curve, AUC) in eight healthy individuals, that are based solely on MI using high-density EEG (HD-EEG) artifact correction (manual correction with vs. without Independent Component Analysis [ICA]), region of interest (ROI; motor area vs. whole brain), and machine-learning algorithm (support-vector machine [SVM] vs. k-nearest neighbor [KNN]).

Results:

Results revealed no significant effects of artifact correction and ROI on predicting participant performance (F1) and classifier performance (AUC) scores (all ps > 0.05) in the SVM classification model. In the KNN model, ROI had a significant influence on the classifier performance [F(1,8.939) = 7.585, p = 0.023]. There was no evidence for artifact correction and ROI selection changing the prediction of participants performance and classifier performance in EEG-based mental MI if using SVM-based classification (71-100% correct classifications across different signal preprocessing methods). The variance in the prediction of participant performance was significantly higher when the experiment started with a resting-state compared to a mental MI task block [X2(1) = 5.849, p = 0.016].

Discussion:

Overall, we could show that classification is stable across different modes of EEG signal preprocessing when using SVM models. Exploratory analysis gave a hint toward potential effects of the sequence of task execution on the prediction of participant performance, which should be taken into account in future studies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article