Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of the DICE Method to Improve Timely Recognition and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Early Alzheimer's Disease at the Memory Clinic: The BEAT-IT Study.
Eikelboom, Willem S; van den Berg, Esther; Coesmans, Michiel; Goudzwaard, Jeannette A; Koopmanschap, Marc; Lazaar, Najoua; van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn L; Driesen, Jan J M; den Heijer, Tom; Hoogers, Susanne; de Jong, Frank Jan; Mattace-Raso, Francesco; Thomeer, Elsbeth C; Vrenken, Suzanne; Vroegindeweij, Lilian J H M; Zuidema, Sytse U; Singleton, Ellen H; van Swieten, John C; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Papma, Janne M.
Afiliação
  • Eikelboom WS; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berg E; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Coesmans M; Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Goudzwaard JA; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Koopmanschap M; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Lazaar N; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Bruchem-Visser RL; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Driesen JJM; Department of Neurology, Franciscus Vlietland, Schiedam, The Netherlands.
  • den Heijer T; Department of Neurology, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hoogers S; Department of Neurology, Spijkenisse Medical Center, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands.
  • de Jong FJ; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mattace-Raso F; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Thomeer EC; Department of Neurology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vrenken S; Department of Geriatrics, Spijkenisse Medical Center, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands.
  • Vroegindeweij LJHM; Department of Neurology, Het Van Weel-Bethesda Ziekenhuis, Dirksland, The Netherlands.
  • Zuidema SU; Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Singleton EH; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Swieten JC; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ossenkoppele R; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Papma JM; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 93(4): 1407-1423, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182887
BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are associated with negative outcomes. However, NPS are currently underrecognized at the memory clinic and non-pharmacological interventions are scarcely implemented. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Describe, Investigate, Create, Evaluate (DICE) method™ to improve the care for NPS in AD at the memory clinic. METHODS: We enrolled sixty community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia and NPS across six Dutch memory clinics with their caregivers. The first wave underwent care as usual (n = 36) and the second wave underwent the DICE method (n = 24). Outcomes were quality of life (QoL), caregiver burden, NPS severity, NPS-related distress, competence managing NPS, and psychotropic drug use. Reliable change index was calculated to identify responders to the intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed and semi-structured interviews with a subsample of the intervention group (n = 12). RESULTS: The DICE method did not improve any outcomes over time compared to care as usual. Half of the participants of the intervention group (52%) were identified as responders and showed more NPS and NPS-related distress at baseline compared to non-responders. Interviews revealed substantial heterogeneity among participants regarding NPS-related distress, caregiver burden, and availability of social support. The intervention did not lead to significant gains in quality-adjusted life years and well-being years nor clear savings in health care and societal costs. CONCLUSION: The DICE method showed no benefits at group-level, but individuals with high levels of NPS and NPS-related distress may benefit from this intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article