Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis.
Delbarre, Bertrand; Baowaidan, Faris; Culty, Thibault; Khelfat, Lotfi; Brassier, Marie; Ferragu, Matthieu; Magnier, Alexandre; Secourgeon, Alexandre; Tariel, Francois; Lebdai, Souhil; Bigot, Pierre.
Afiliação
  • Delbarre B; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Baowaidan F; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Culty T; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Khelfat L; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Brassier M; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Ferragu M; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Magnier A; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Secourgeon A; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Tariel F; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Lebdai S; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
  • Bigot P; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 51: 7-12, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37187726
ABSTRACT

Background:

Lithotripsy with holmiumyttrium-aluminum-garnet (HoYAG) laser is the current gold standard for treating stones of the upper urinary tract (UUT). The recently introduced thulium fiber laser (TFL) has the potential to be more efficient and as safe as HoYAG.

Objective:

To compare the performance and complications between HoYAG and TFL for UUT lithotripsy. Design setting and

participants:

This was a prospective single-center study of 182 patients treated between February 2021 and February 2022. In a consecutive approach, laser lithotripsy was performed via ureteroscopy with HoYAG for 5 mo, and then with TFL for 5 mo. Outcome measurements and statistical

analysis:

Our primary outcome was stone-free (SF) status at 3 mo after ureteroscopy with HoYAG versus TFL lithotripsy. Secondary outcomes were complication rates and results regarding the cumulative stone size. Patients were followed at 3 mo with abdominal imaging (ultrasound or computed tomography). Results and

limitations:

The study cohort comprised 76 patients treated with HoYAG laser and 100 patients treated with TFL. Cumulative stone size was significantly higher in the TFL than in the HoYAG group (20.4 vs 14.8 mm; p = 0.01). SF status was similar in both groups (68.4% vs 72%; p = 0.06). Complication rates were comparable. In subgroup analysis, the SF rate was significantly higher (81.6% vs 62.5%; p = 0.04) and the operative time was shorter for stones measuring 1-2 cm, whereas the results were similar for stones <1 cm and >2 cm. The lack of randomization and single-center design are the main limitations of the study.

Conclusions:

TFL and HoYAG lithotripsy are comparable in terms of the SF rate and safety for the treatment of UUT lithiasis. According to our study, for a cumulative stone size of 1-2 cm, TFL is more effective than HoYAG. Patient

summary:

We compared the efficiency and safety of two laser types for the treatment of stones in the upper urinary tract. We found that stone-free status at 3 months did not significantly differ between the holmium and thulium lasers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article