Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective analysis of survival of avulsed and replanted permanent teeth according to 2012 or 2020 IADT Guidelines.
Roskamp, Liliane; Perin, Camila Paiva; Castro, Juliana Pierdoná de; Mattos, Natanael Henrique Ribeiro; Campos, Maria Carolina Botellho Pires de; Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão; Ignácio, Sérgio Aparecido; Locks, Maria Eduarda Nunis; Westphalen, Vânia Portela Ditzel; Baratto-Filho, Flares.
Afiliação
  • Roskamp L; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Perin CP; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Castro JP; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Mattos NHR; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Campos MCBP; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Gabardo MCL; School of Health Sciences. Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil, PR.
  • Ignácio SA; School of Life Sciences. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Locks MEN; Department of Dentistry. Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, SC, Brazil.
  • Westphalen VPD; Department of Dentistry. Universidade Tuituti do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Baratto-Filho F; Department of Dentistry. Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, SC, Brazil.
Braz Dent J ; 34(2): 122-128, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37194850
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the survival of replanted teeth that followed the 2012 or the 2020 International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines. Sixty-two permanent replanted teeth were retrospectively assessed (IADT 2012, n = 45; IADT 2020, n = 17). Five years after replantation (from January 2017 to December 2021), clinical and radiographic examinations were performed. A significance level of 95% was considered to evaluate the outcomes. Thirty-one teeth (50.0%) remained in their sockets and 31 (50.0%) were lost due to external root resorption. Of the 25 (40.3%) teeth replanted within one hour, 16 (64.0%) remained in their sockets, and 9 (36.0%) were lost. Twenty-two (71.0%) of all 31 lost teeth had an extra-alveolar time of more than one hour. Twelve teeth remained in their sockets without resorption 8 (66.7%) were replanted within one hour, 2 (16.7%) followed the 2012 IADT, and 2 (16.7%) the 2020 IADT guidelines for late replantation. There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the extra-alveolar time (< one hour), but without difference between the guidelines in late replantation (p > 0.05). Replanted teeth following both, 2012 or 2020 IADT guidelines, have similar clinical outcomes. The extra-alveolar time of less than one hour was demonstrated to be important to keep the permanent tooth in its socket.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabsorção da Raiz / Avulsão Dentária / Traumatologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabsorção da Raiz / Avulsão Dentária / Traumatologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article