Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Preferences Regarding Surgical Treatment Methods for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.
Babalola, Olufemi; Gebben, David; Tarver, Michelle E; Sangha, Roopina; Roberts, Jason; Price, Veronica.
Afiliação
  • Babalola O; Patient Science & Engagement, Office of Strategic Partnerships and Technology Innovation, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Bldg. 66, Room 5574, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. Olufemi.babalola@fda.hhs.gov.
  • Gebben D; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Tarver ME; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Sangha R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Roberts J; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Price V; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 57(5): 976-986, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210440
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to rank the factors that are most and least important to patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids when considering surgical treatment options. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Using a best worst scaling (BWS) preference elicitation approach, participants completed an online survey to rank factors associated with fibroid surgical treatments. Survey content was based on a literature review and included the following factors symptom relief; surgical complications; repeat treatment; recovery time; cosmetic effects; risk of spreading undiagnosed cancer; sexual outcomes; maintenance of child-bearing; continuation of menses; unpredictable menses; and location of procedure. Participants completed 11 BWS tasks. For each task, we presented participants with a subset of 5 factors from the possible 11, and participants chose the most important and least important factor. Participants' responses were analyzed using conditional logistic regression to determine the relative importance of factors. Patient priorities were further explored via age and race.

RESULTS:

285 respondents with symptomatic uterine fibroids (69 physician-confirmed and 216 self-reported) who had not undergone prior surgical treatment completed the survey. Respondents were enrolled from two clinical sites (clinical site cohort) and an online consumer panel (panel cohort). Both cohorts identified symptom relief, cancer risk, repeat treatment and complications as the most important factors in selecting surgical treatment options and location of procedure, return to normal activities after surgery, and cosmetic effects like presence of a scar after the surgical treatment as the least important factors. Of note, younger women (≤ 40) placed greater importance on the ability to have children after the procedure.

CONCLUSION:

Information regarding the factors most and least important to patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids might inform development and regulatory evaluation of new technologies and procedures. Study results may be useful in efforts to develop a set of outcomes to include in future fibroids clinical studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Leiomioma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Leiomioma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article