Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Significant increased bacterial contamination with endoscope overnight and weekend storage times.
Guadagnin, Simone Vieira Toledo; Costa, Dayane de Melo; Primo, Mariusa Gomes Borges; Silva, Adriana Azevedo; Leão-Vasconcelos, Lara Stefânia Netto de Oliveira; Vickery, Karen; Tipple, Anaclara Ferreira Veiga.
Afiliação
  • Guadagnin SVT; Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
  • Costa DM; Faculty of Nursing, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
  • Primo MGB; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Silva AA; Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
  • Leão-Vasconcelos LSNO; Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
  • Vickery K; Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
  • Tipple AFV; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 38(9): 1559-1565, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37254616
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Forced-air drying (FAD) cabinets are recommended for storage of reprocessed endoscopes, but financial constraints prevent their universal application. The study aimed to determine bacterial contamination in flexible gastroscopes (FG) channels after storage, in a cabinet with filtered air and UV lights, but without FAD.

METHODS:

Eight FG in clinical use in an endoscopy service of a large Brazilian hospital were sampled immediately "Time zero" (N = 50), 12 h "Time 1" (N = 25), and 60 h "Time 2" (N = 25) after reprocessing. Following a flush-brush-flush of channels, 40-mL sterile water and 3 cm of the brush were collected. Each sample was divided, filtered onto two 0.22-µm membranes, and incubated in media without or with disinfectant neutralizer. Automated method was used for identification and antibiotic resistance test of isolated bacteria.

RESULTS:

Bacterial contamination in times "1" and "2" was 5.9 and 16.1 times greater than that of "Time zero," respectively. Number of positive cultures in media with and without neutralizer was similar at times "1" and "2," while media with neutralizer produced more positive cultures at "Time zero." Most bacteria isolated at "Time 2" were Gram-negative rods (52.3%) and showed resistance to one or more antibiotics (65%).

CONCLUSION:

Bacterial contamination was detected on reprocessed FG stored in non-FAD cabinets overnight (12 h) and increased with longer storage time (60 h). The contamination source is likely to be bacteria in biofilm which multiply in the absence of FAD. Evidence-based criteria should be available for storage time according to the cabinet available.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desinfecção / Contaminação de Equipamentos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desinfecção / Contaminação de Equipamentos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article