Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Analysis of Three Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Zirconia to Resin-luting Agents: An In Vitro Study.
Swarnakar, Arka; Swarnakar, Angana Pal; Pal, Himadri Sekhar; Tyagi, Shivani; Rawat, Pragati; Sharma, Abhinav.
Afiliação
  • Swarnakar A; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, Phone: +91 7477540054, e-mail: drswarnakaronline@gmail.com.
  • Swarnakar AP; Consultant Prosthodontist, Modern Dental Clinic, Khamarchandi, Hooghly, West Bengal, India.
  • Pal HS; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, KSD Jain Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  • Tyagi S; Dental Square, Gajraula, Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Rawat P; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sharma A; Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 23(9): 883-888, 2022 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37282994
AIM: To study the impact of three different surface treatments namely sandblasting, silane-coupling agent, and laser on the retention of zirconia prosthesis and bond strength of zirconia to a resin-luting agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty zirconia crowns were fabricated and were divided into four groups of 15 samples each on the basis of surface treatments. A control group with no surface treatment (group A), laser-treated (group B), treatment with silane-coupling agent (group C), and sandblasting with aluminium oxide (Al2O3) particles (group D). Testing was then carried out using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min crosshead speed). At a point where the crown got separated from the tooth, the reading in kilogram force (kgF) was recorded. The data were collected and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Group D produced the highest mean bond strength (17.5233 kgF) followed by group B (10.0067 kgF), group C (8.6907 kgF), and group A (3.3773 kgF). One-way ANOVA test showed a p-value more than 0.05, concluding no significant difference among the groups. Tukey's HSD post hoc test gave the p-value corresponding to the F-statistic of one-way ANOVA lower than 0.01 when intergroup comparison was done confirming a significant difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: The bond strength significantly increased in the samples treated by sandblasting compared with those treated with laser and silane-coupling agents. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The success of a zirconia prosthesis lies on its bonding with the tooth structure. Bond failure leads to loss of function and hence ends up in failure. Selection of the proper surface treatment will not only improve the bond strength but also amplify the retention of zirconia-based prosthesis, thereby reducing the failure of the final prosthesis. It also improves the longevity of the prosthesis and restores the lost function which is the basic clinical aim of a prosthodontic treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colagem Dentária Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colagem Dentária Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article