Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening.
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller; Mills, Sarah D; Kuo, Tzy-Mey; Baggett, Chris D; Wheeler, Stephanie B.
Afiliação
  • Lich KH; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1105E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, CB #7411, USA. klich@unc.edu.
  • Mills SD; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Kuo TM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Baggett CD; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Wheeler SB; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(Suppl 1): 187-198, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37285065
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Assessing factors associated with being up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important for identifying populations for which targeted interventions may be needed.

METHODS:

This study used Medicare and private insurance claims data for residents of North Carolina to identify up-to-date status in the 10th year of continuous enrollment in the claims data and in available subsequent years. USPSTF guidelines were used to define up-to-date status for multiple recommended modalities. Area Health Resources Files provided geographic and health care service provider data at the county level. A generalized estimating equation logistic regression model was used to examine the association between individual- and county-level characteristics and being up-to-date with CRC screening.

RESULTS:

From 2012-2016, 75% of the sample (n = 274,660) age 59-75 was up-to-date. We identified several individual- (e.g., sex, age, insurance type, recent visit with a primary care provider, distance to nearest endoscopy facility, insurance type) and county-level (e.g., percentage of residents with a high school education, without insurance, and unemployed) predictors of being up-to-date. For example, individuals had higher odds of being up-to-date if they were age 73-75 as compared to age 59 [OR 1.12 (1.09, 1.15)], and if living in counties with more primary care physicians [OR 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)].

CONCLUSION:

This study identified 12 individual- and county-level demographic characteristics related to being up-to-date with screening to inform how interventions may optimally be targeted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Medicare Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Medicare Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article