Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Schoretsanitis, Georgios; Gastaldon, Chiara; Ochsenbein-Koelble, Nicole; Olbrich, Sebastian; Barbui, Corrado; Seifritz, Erich.
Afiliação
  • Schoretsanitis G; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Gastaldon C; Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York, USA.
  • Ochsenbein-Koelble N; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, New York, USA.
  • Olbrich S; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Barbui C; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Seifritz E; Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 2023 Jun 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286177
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the postpartum depression (PPD) risk in women with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and moderators.

METHODS:

We identified observational studies of PPD rates in women with versus without PPH in Embase/Medline/PsychInfo/Cinhail in 09/2022. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Our primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR, 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]) of PPD in women with versus without PPH. Meta-regression analyses included the effects of age, body mass index, marital status, education, history of depression/anxiety, preeclampsia, antenatal anemia and C-section; subgroup analyses were based on PPH and PPD assessment methods, samples with versus without history of depression/anxiety, from low-/middle- versus high-income countries. We performed sensitivity analyses after excluding poor-quality studies, cross-sectional studies and sequentially each study.

RESULTS:

One, five and three studies were rated as good-, fair- and poor-quality respectively. In nine studies (k = 10 cohorts, n = 934,432), women with PPH were at increased PPD risk compared to women without PPH (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.44, p < 0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98.9%). Higher PPH-related PPD ORs were estimated in samples with versus without history of depression/anxiety or antidepressant exposure (OR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.18 to 1.60, k = 6, n = 55,212, versus 1.06, 95%CI = 1.04 to 1.09, k = 3, n = 879,220, p < 0.001) and in cohorts from low-/middle- versus high-income countries (OR = 1.49, 95%CI = 1.37 to 1.61, k = 4, n = 9197, versus 1.13, 95%CI = 1.04 to 1.23, k = 6, n = 925,235, p < 0.001). After excluding low-quality studies the PPD OR dropped (1.14, 95%CI = 1.02 to 1.29, k = 6, n = 929,671, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Women with PPH had increased PPD risk amplified by history of depression/anxiety, whereas more data from low-/middle-income countries are required.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article