Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An In Vitro Assessment.
Soto-Palou, Francois; Chen, Junqin; Medairos, Robert; Zhong, Pei; Antonelli, Jodi; Preminger, Glenn M; Lipkin, Michael E.
Afiliação
  • Soto-Palou F; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Chen J; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Medairos R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Zhong P; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Antonelli J; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Preminger GM; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Lipkin ME; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Endourol ; 37(8): 914-920, 2023 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300481
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Low energy and high frequency settings are used in stone dusting for holmium lasers. Such settings may not be optimal for thulium fiber laser (TFL). With the seemingly endless combination of settings, we aim to provide guidance to the practicing urologists and assess the efficiency of the TFL platform in an automated in vitro "dusting model." Materials/

Methods:

Three experimental setups were designed to investigate stone dusting produced by an IPG Photonics TLR-50 W TFL system using 200 µm fiber and soft BegoStone phantoms. The most popular 10 and 20 W dusting settings among endourologist familiar with TFL were evaluated. We directly compared short pulse (SP) vs long pulse (LP) mode using various combinations of pulse energy (Ep) and pulse frequency (F). Thereafter, we tested the 10 and 20 W settings and compared them among each other to elucidate the most efficient settings at each power. Treatments were performed under the same total laser energy delivered to the stone at four different standoff distances (SDs) with a clinically relevant scanning speed of either 1 or 2 mm/sec. Ablation volumes were quantified by optical coherence tomography to assess stone dusting efficiency. Fragment size after ablation at different pulse energies was evaluated by sieving and evaluating under a microscope after treatment.

Results:

Overall, SP provided greater ablation volume when compared with LP. Our dusting efficiency model demonstrated that the maximum stone ablation was achieved at the combination of high energy/low frequency settings (p < 0.005) and at a SD of 0.2 mm. At all tested pulse energies, no stone phantoms were broken into fragments >1 mm.

Conclusions:

During stone dusting with TFL, SP offers superior ablation to LP settings. Optimal dusting at clinically relevant scanning speeds of 1 and 2 mm/sec occurs at high energy/low frequency settings. Thulium lithotripsy with high Ep does not result in increased fragment size.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Urinários / Litotripsia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Urinários / Litotripsia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article