Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical analysis of the reporting quality of animal studies within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for Animal Studies in Endodontics (PRIASE) 2021 quality standard checklist.
Tzanetakis, Giorgos; Jakovljevic, Aleksandar; Koletsi, Despina; Jacimovic, Jelena; Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu; Duncan, Henry Fergus; Dummer, Paul Michael Howell.
Afiliação
  • Tzanetakis G; Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Jakovljevic A; Department of Pathophysiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Koletsi D; Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Jacimovic J; Meta- Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Nagendrababu V; Central Library, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Duncan HF; University of Sharjah, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Sharjah, UAE.
  • Dummer PMH; Division of Restorative Dentistry & Periodontology, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Int Endod J ; 56(9): 1042-1062, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300853
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To critically evaluate the reporting quality of a random sample of animal studies within the field of endodontics against the Preferred Reporting Items for Animal Studies in Endodontics (PRIASE) 2021 checklist and to investigate the association between the quality of reporting and several characteristics of the selected studies.

METHODOLOGY:

Fifty animal studies related to endodontics were randomly selected from the PubMed database with publication dates from January 2017 to December 2021. For each study, a score of '1' was given when the item of the PRIASE 2021 checklist was fully reported, whereas a score of '0' was given when an item was not reported; when the item was inadequately or partially reported, a score of '0.5' was given. Based on the overall scores allocated to each manuscript, they were allocated into three categories of reporting quality low, moderate and high. Associations between study characteristics and reporting quality scores were also analysed. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to describe the data and determine associations. The probability value of .05 was selected as the level of statistical significance.

RESULTS:

Based on the overall scores, four (8%) and 46 (92%) of the animal studies evaluated were categorized as 'High' and 'Moderate' reporting quality, respectively. A number of items were adequately reported in all studies related to background (Item 4a), relevance of methods/results (7a) and interpretation of images (11e), whereas only one item related to changes in protocol (6d) was not reported in any. No associations were confirmed between reporting quality scores and number of authors, origin of the corresponding author, journal of publication (endodontic specialty vs. non- specialty), impact factor or year of publication.

CONCLUSIONS:

Animal studies published in the specialty of endodontics were mostly of 'moderate' quality in terms of the quality of reporting. Adherence to the PRIASE 2021 guidelines will enhance the reporting of animal studies in the expectation that all future publications will be high quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endodontia / Lista de Checagem Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endodontia / Lista de Checagem Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article