Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-exploitative human disturbance provides shelter for prey from predator.
Lamichhane, Saneer; Lamichhane, Babu Ram; Gurung, Aasish; Rayamajhi, Trishna; Dahal, Tulasi Prasad; Regmi, Pramod Raj; Pokheral, Chiranjibi Prasad; Pathak, Abhinaya; Panta, Ganesh; Kandel, Ram Chandra; Oli, Madan K.
Afiliação
  • Lamichhane S; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Lamichhane BR; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
  • Gurung A; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Rayamajhi T; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Dahal TP; Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
  • Regmi PR; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Pokheral CP; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Pathak A; National Trust for Nature Conservation Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Panta G; Ministry of Forests and Environment Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Kandel RC; Ministry of Forests and Environment Kathmandu Nepal.
  • Oli MK; Ministry of Forests and Environment Kathmandu Nepal.
Ecol Evol ; 13(6): e10200, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37332517
ABSTRACT
Human activities can influence behaviors of predators and prey, as well as predator-prey interactions. Using camera trap data, we investigated whether or to what extent human activities influenced behaviors of predators (tigers and leopards) and prey (sambar deer, spotted deer, wild boar, and barking deer), and predator-prey interactions in the Barandabhar Corridor Forest (BCF), Chitwan District, Nepal. A multispecies occupancy model revealed that the presence of humans altered the conditional occupancy of both prey and predator species. Specifically, the conditional occupancy probability of prey was substantially higher (ψ = 0.91, CI = 0.89-0.92) when humans were present than when humans were absent (ψ = 0.68, CI = 0.54-0.79). The diel activity pattern of most prey species overlapped strongly with humans, whereas predators were generally more active when humans were absent. Finally, the spatiotemporal overlap analysis revealed that human-prey interactions (i.e., the probability that both humans and prey species being present on the same grid at the same hourly period) was ~3 times higher (10.5%, CI = 10.4%-10.6%) compared to spatiotemporal overlap between humans and predators (3.1%, CI = 3.0%-3.2%). Our findings are consistent with the human shield hypothesis and suggest that ungulate prey species may reduce predation risk by using areas with high human activities.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article