Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints.
Ramanathan, Swetha; Evans, Charlesnika T; Hershow, Ronald C; Calip, Gregory S; Rowan, Susan; Hubbard, Colin; Suda, Katie J.
Afiliação
  • Ramanathan S; School of Public Heath, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Evans CT; Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
  • Hershow RC; Department of Preventive Medicine and Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Calip GS; School of Public Heath, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Rowan S; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hubbard C; College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Suda KJ; Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 427, 2023 Jun 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353757
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

No research has been conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing differs by dental setting. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-Veterans Affairs settings.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study of veteran and non-veteran dental patients with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints between 2015-2017. Multivariable log binomial regression analysis was conducted to compare concordant prescribing by setting with a sub-analysis for errors of dosing based on antibiotic duration (i.e., days prescribed).

RESULTS:

A total of 61,124 dental visits that received a prophylactic antibiotic were included. Most were male (61.0%), and 55 years of age or older (76.2%). Nearly a third (32.7%) received guideline concordant prophylaxis. VA dental settings had a lower prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing compared to non-VA settings in unadjusted results (unadjusted prevalence ratio [uPR] = 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.95). After adjustment, prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing was higher in those with prosthetic joints in the VA setting (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.73, 95% CI 1.59-1.88), with no difference identified in those without a prosthetic joint (aPR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01). Concordance of dosing was higher in VA compared to non-VA settings (aPR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS:

VA has a higher prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing among those with prosthetic joints and when assessing dosing errors. Though the presence of an integrated electronic health record (EHR) may be contributing to these differences, other system or prescriber-related factors may be responsible. Future studies should focus on to what extent the integrated EHR may be responsible for increased guideline concordant prescribing in the VA setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antibioticoprofilaxia / Cardiopatias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antibioticoprofilaxia / Cardiopatias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article