Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cumulative patellofemoral force and stress are lower during faster running compared to slower running in recreational runners.
Doyle, Eoin W; Doyle, Tim L A; Bonacci, Jason; Beach, Aaron J; Fuller, Joel T.
Afiliação
  • Doyle EW; Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Doyle TLA; Biomechanics, Physical Performance, and Exercise Research Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bonacci J; Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Beach AJ; Biomechanics, Physical Performance, and Exercise Research Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Fuller JT; Centre for Sports Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Sports Biomech ; : 1-13, 2023 Jun 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364918
Management strategies for patellofemoral pain often involve modifying running distance or speed. However, the optimal modification strategy to manage patellofemoral joint (PFJ) force and stress accumulated during running warrants further investigation. This study investigated the effect of running speed on peak and cumulative PFJ force and stress in recreational runners. Twenty recreational runners ran on an instrumented treadmill at four speeds (2.5-4.2 m/s). A musculoskeletal model derived peak and cumulative (per 1 km of continuous running) PFJ force and stress for each speed. Cumulative PFJ force and stress decreased with faster speeds (9.3-33.6% reduction for 3.1-4.2 m/s vs. 2.5 m/s). Peak PFJ force and stress significantly increased with faster speeds (9.3-35.6% increase for 3.1-4.2 m/s vs. 2.5 m/s). The largest cumulative PFJ kinetics reductions occurred when speeds increased from 2.5 to 3.1 m/s (13.7-14.2%). Running at faster speeds increases the magnitude of peak PFJ kinetics but conversely results in less accumulated force over a set distance. Selecting moderate running speeds (~3.1 m/s) with reduced training duration or an interval-based approach may be more effective for managing cumulative PFJ kinetics compared to running at slow speeds.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article