Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs and Consequences of a Novel Emergency Department Sepsis Diagnostic Test: The IntelliSep Index.
Hollenbeak, Christopher S; Henning, Daniel J; Geeting, Glenn K; Ledeboer, Nathan A; Faruqi, Imran A; Pierce, Christi G; Thomas, Christopher B; O'Neal, Hollis R.
Afiliação
  • Hollenbeak CS; Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Henning DJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Geeting GK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Grant Memorial Hospital, Petersburg, WV.
  • Ledeboer NA; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Faruqi IA; Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
  • Pierce CG; Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
  • Thomas CB; Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
  • O'Neal HR; Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(7): e0942, 2023 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37465702
ABSTRACT
Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED. PERSPECTIVE U.S. healthcare system.

SETTING:

Community hospital ED.

METHODS:

A decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.

RESULTS:

Assuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

ISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article