Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Outcome of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy for Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Predictors of Anatomical Failure.
Alsahabi, Jawaher A; Alsary, Saeed; Abolfotouh, Mostafa A.
Afiliação
  • Alsahabi JA; Department Urogynecology & Reconstructive Female Pelvic Surgery, King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, 22490, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alsary S; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud Ben Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
  • Abolfotouh MA; Department Urogynecology & Reconstructive Female Pelvic Surgery, King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, 22490, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Womens Health ; 15: 1093-1105, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37483888
ABSTRACT

Background:

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a medical condition that profoundly impacts women's quality of life. Unfortunately, the literature lacks long-term predictors and risk factors for its recurrence. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy and to identify the predictors of recurrence in a Saudi setting.

Methods:

In a retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent Sacrocolpopexy (n=144) and Sacrohysteropexy (n=56) between 2009-2021 were followed up. Electronic medical records were examined to collect data on the following Patient characteristics [age, parity, BMI, and past medical and surgical history], prolapse-related characteristics/symptoms, Surgery-related characteristics [type and approach of surgery, mesh type, and concomitant surgery], and Outcome characteristics. Postoperative anatomical success and failure rates were determined according to the Baden-Walker classification. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the predictors of overall anatomical failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results:

Success rates of 96.8%, 99.4%, and 85.2% were detected in the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal prolapse, respectively, with an overall success rate of 83.1%. The overall failure rate was 15.9%, with an incidence density of 5.98 per 100 women-years. The onset of failure in 27 failure cases ranged from 40 days to 11.5 years postoperative. After adjustment for the possible potential confounders, older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI1.01‒1.13, p=0.03) and the presence of diabetes (OR=4.93, 95% CI1.33‒18.33, p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of operation failure. As for complications, six cases (3.6%) required reoperation, two cases (1.2%) had a bowel obstruction two and seven years after surgery, and one patient (0.6%) had vaginal mesh exposure.

Conclusion:

The outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy in our study are comparable to those in previous studies. Diabetes and elder age at the time of the surgery played a role in predicting recurrence. Sacrocolpopexy has a long-term profile of safety and efficacy. These findings could be key to stratifying surgical plans for pelvic organ prolapse cases.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article