Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The perceptions and experience of developing patient (version of) guidelines: a descriptive qualitative study with Chinese guideline developers.
Yan, Lijiao; Hu, Jiale; Yu, Zeyu; Li, Shelly-Anne; Graham, Karen; Scott, Sarah E; Shen, Chen; Jin, Xuejing; Liu, Jianping.
Afiliação
  • Yan L; Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Hu J; Department of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VG, USA. jhu4@vcu.edu.
  • Yu Z; Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Li SA; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Graham K; Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Gyle Square 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Scott SE; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.
  • Shen C; Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Jin X; Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Liu J; Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. Liujp@bucm.edu.cn.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 789, 2023 Jul 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37488555
OBJECTIVE: To understand developers' perception of patient (versions of) guidelines (PVGs), and identify challenges during the PVG development, with the aim to inform methodological guidance for future PVG development. METHODS: We used a descriptive qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually from December 2021 to April 2022, with a purposive sampling of 12 PVG developers from nine teams in China. Conventional and directed content analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The interviews identified PVG developers' understanding of PVGs, their current practice experience, and the challenges of developing PVGs. Participants believed PVGs were a type of health education material for patients; therefore, it should be based on patient needs and be understandable and accessible. Participants suggested that PVGs could be translated/adapted from one or several clinical practice guidelines (CPG), or developed de novo (i.e., the creation of an entirely new PVG with its own set of research questions that are independent of existing CPGs). Participants perceived those existing methodological guidelines for PVG development might not provide clear instructions for PVGs developed from multiple CPGs and from de novo development. Challenges to PVG development include (1) a lack of standardized and native guidance on developing PVGs; (2) a lack of standardized guidance on patient engagement; (3) other challenges: no publicly known and trusted platform that could disseminate PVGs; concerns about the conflicting interests with health professionals. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our study suggests clarifying the concept of PVG is the primary task to develop PVGs and carry out related research. There is a need to make PVG developers realize the roles of PVGs, especially in helping decision-making, to maximize the effect of PVG. It is necessary to develop native consensus-based guidance considering developers' perspectives regarding PVGs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Pessoal de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Pessoal de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article