Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of alternative manual and automated deep learning segmentation techniques for the prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules.
Selby, Heather M; Mukherjee, Pritam; Parham, Christopher; Malik, Sachin B; Gevaert, Olivier; Napel, Sandy; Shah, Rajesh P.
Afiliação
  • Selby HM; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (BMIR), Stanford, California, United States.
  • Mukherjee P; National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
  • Parham C; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
  • Malik SB; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
  • Gevaert O; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (BMIR), Stanford, California, United States.
  • Napel S; Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States.
  • Shah RP; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 10(4): 044006, 2023 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37564098
Purpose: We aim to evaluate the performance of radiomic biopsy (RB), best-fit bounding box (BB), and a deep-learning-based segmentation method called no-new-U-Net (nnU-Net), compared to the standard full manual (FM) segmentation method for predicting benign and malignant lung nodules using a computed tomography (CT) radiomic machine learning model. Materials and Methods: A total of 188 CT scans of lung nodules from 2 institutions were used for our study. One radiologist identified and delineated all 188 lung nodules, whereas a second radiologist segmented a subset (n=20) of these nodules. Both radiologists employed FM and RB segmentation methods. BB segmentations were generated computationally from the FM segmentations. The nnU-Net, a deep-learning-based segmentation method, performed automatic nodule detection and segmentation. The time radiologists took to perform segmentations was recorded. Radiomic features were extracted from each segmentation method, and models to predict benign and malignant lung nodules were developed. The Kruskal-Wallis and DeLong tests were used to compare segmentation times and areas under the curve (AUC), respectively. Results: For the delineation of the FM, RB, and BB segmentations, the two radiologists required a median time (IQR) of 113 (54 to 251.5), 21 (9.25 to 38), and 16 (12 to 64.25) s, respectively (p=0.04). In dataset 1, the mean AUC (95% CI) of the FM, RB, BB, and nnU-Net model were 0.964 (0.96 to 0.968), 0.985 (0.983 to 0.987), 0.961 (0.956 to 0.965), and 0.878 (0.869 to 0.888). In dataset 2, the mean AUC (95% CI) of the FM, RB, BB, and nnU-Net model were 0.717 (0.705 to 0.729), 0.919 (0.913 to 0.924), 0.699 (0.687 to 0.711), and 0.644 (0.632 to 0.657). Conclusion: Radiomic biopsy-based models outperformed FM and BB models in prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules in two independent datasets while deep-learning segmentation-based models performed similarly to FM and BB. RB could be a more efficient segmentation method, but further validation is needed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article