Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AI-support for the detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions: One-year prospective evaluation.
van Leeuwen, K G; Becks, M J; Grob, D; de Lange, F; Rutten, J H E; Schalekamp, S; Rutten, M J C M; van Ginneken, B; de Rooij, M; Meijer, F J A.
Afiliação
  • van Leeuwen KG; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Becks MJ; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Grob D; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • de Lange F; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Rutten JHE; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Schalekamp S; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Rutten MJCM; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Ginneken B; Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
  • de Rooij M; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Meijer FJA; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Heliyon ; 9(8): e19065, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37636476
Purpose: Few studies have evaluated real-world performance of radiological AI-tools in clinical practice. Over one-year, we prospectively evaluated the use of AI software to support the detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions (LVO) on CT angiography (CTA). Method: Quantitative measures (user log-in attempts, AI standalone performance) and qualitative data (user surveys) were reviewed by a key-user group at three timepoints. A total of 491 CTA studies of 460 patients were included for analysis. Results: The overall accuracy of the AI-tool for LVO detection and localization was 87.6%, sensitivity 69.1% and specificity 91.2%. Out of 81 LVOs, 31 of 34 (91%) M1 occlusions were detected correctly, 19 of 38 (50%) M2 occlusions, and 6 of 9 (67%) ICA occlusions. The product was considered user-friendly. The diagnostic confidence of the users for LVO detection remained the same over the year. The last measured net promotor score was -56%. The use of the AI-tool fluctuated over the year with a declining trend. Conclusions: Our pragmatic approach of evaluating the AI-tool used in clinical practice, helped us to monitor the usage, to estimate the perceived added value by the users of the AI-tool, and to make an informed decision about the continuation of the use of the AI-tool.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article