Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Absorbable Sutures and Telemedicine for Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Release.
Holbert, S Elliott; Brown, Cameron; Baxter, Samantha; Johnson, Andrea H; Gelfand, Jeffrey; Shushan, Alexander; Turcotte, Justin J; Jones, Christopher.
Afiliação
  • Holbert SE; Orthopedic Research, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Brown C; Orthopedic Research, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Baxter S; Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Johnson AH; Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Gelfand J; Orthopedic Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Shushan A; Orthopedic Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Turcotte JJ; Orthopedic Research, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Jones C; Orthopedic Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Cureus ; 15(7): e42486, 2023 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37637594
ABSTRACT
Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article