Analysis of treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer using the national cancer database: Factors associated with receipt of aggressive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the treatments received by muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients, analyze their use according to sociodemographic, clinical, pathologic, and facility variables, and identify possibilities for improvement in care, with the understanding that patients with MIBC face a potentially lethal disease, yet often do not receive guideline-concordant potentially curative therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we analyzed 102,119 patients with MIBC diagnosed from 2009 to 2018. Treatments included cystectomy, radiation, chemotherapy (CT), or observation. Treatments including cystectomy or radiotherapy (RT) ≥50 Gy were considered aggressive therapy (AT). A multivariable generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the impact of the independent variables with receiving AT, using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years, with 72.9% male, 84.3% White, and 7.1% Black. Stage distribution was 59.4% stage II, 23.0% stage III, and 17.6% stage IV. Overall, 55.2% of patients received AT, while 41.1% did not, with 26.6% receiving observation alone after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. 45.4% received cystectomy, 9.8% received RT, and 12.8% received CT as primary treatment. Notably, over 30% of patients ages 50 to 70 did not receive aggressive therapy. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with nonreceipt of AT included age >70 (OR < 0.79, P < 0.0001), Black race (OR 0.70, P < 0.0001), underinsured status (OR 0.62, P < 0.0001), high comorbidity (OR 0.74, P < 0.0001), and treatment at low volume (OR 0.72 P < 0.0001) or nonacademic cancer program (OR 0.54, P < 0.0001). Long-term trends included increases in utilization of perioperative CT (17.5% in 2009 to 46.7% in 2018, P < 0.001), and chemoradiation (5.4% in 2009 to 8.8% in 2018, P < 0.001). Using Cox regression analysis to control for confounding variables, receipt of aggressive therapy was associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Over a third of patients did not receive AT for MIBC, with many of these patients seemingly eligible by age and comorbidity status. Prospective studies are needed to determine why these patients do not receive AT. A better understanding of patient vs. access to care vs. provider factors will help to focus efforts to improve care for MIBC patients.