Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Melanoma Patients.
Reichert, Constance; Baldini, Capucine; Mezghani, Sarah; Maubec, Eve; Longvert, Christine; Mortier, Laurent; Quereux, Gaëlle; Jannic, Arnaud; Machet, Laurent; de Quatrebarbes, Julie; Nardin, Charlée; Beneton, Nathalie; Amini Adle, Mona; Funck-Brentano, Elisa; Descamps, Vincent; Hachon, Lorry; Malissen, Nausicaa; Baroudjian, Barouyr; Brunet-Possenti, Florence.
Afiliação
  • Reichert C; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Bichat AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France.
  • Baldini C; Drug Development Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, CNRS-UMS 3655 and INSERM US23, 94805 Villejuif, France.
  • Mezghani S; Department of Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
  • Maubec E; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Avicenne AP-HP, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord-Campus de Bobigny, 93000 Bobigny, France.
  • Longvert C; Department of Dermatology, EA4340-BECCOH, Hôpital Ambroise Paré APHP, Université Paris-Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Mortier L; Department of Dermatology, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille University, Inserm U1189, 59000 Lille, France.
  • Quereux G; Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, CIC 1413, INSERM, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302, Nantes University, 44000 Nantes, France.
  • Jannic A; Dermatology Department, Hôpital Henri Mondor AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France.
  • Machet L; Department of Dermatology, Tours University Hospital, 37000 Tours, France.
  • de Quatrebarbes J; Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois, 74370 Annecy, France.
  • Nardin C; Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, EFS, INSERM, UMR RIGHT, 25000 Besançon, France.
  • Beneton N; Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, 72037 Le Mans, France.
  • Amini Adle M; Oncodermatology Department Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France.
  • Funck-Brentano E; Department of Dermatology, EA4340-BECCOH, Hôpital Ambroise Paré APHP, Université Paris-Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Descamps V; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Bichat AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France.
  • Hachon L; Department of Pharmacy, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France.
  • Malissen N; Dermatology and Skin Cancer Department, APHM, CRCM Inserm U1068, CNRS U7258, CHU Timone, Aix Marseille University, 13007 Marseille, France.
  • Baroudjian B; Department of Dermato-Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Inserm U976, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France.
  • Brunet-Possenti F; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Bichat AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(17)2023 Aug 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37686606
Data regarding elderly melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are in favor of tolerability outcomes that are similar to those of younger counterparts. However, there are very few studies focusing on elderly patients receiving nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI). Here, we ask what are the current prescribing patterns of NIVO + IPI in the very elderly population and analyze the tolerance profile. This French multicenter retrospective study was conducted on 60 melanoma patients aged 80 years and older treated with NIVO + IPI between January 2011 and June 2022. The mean age at first NIVO + IPI administration was 83.7 years (range: 79.3-93.3 years). Fifty-five patients (92%) were in good general condition and lived at home. Two dosing regimens were used: NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W (NIVO1 + IPI3) in 27 patients (45%) and NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W (NIVO3 + IPI1) in 33 patients (55%). NIVO + IPI was a first-line treatment in 39 patients (65%). The global prevalence of immune-related adverse events was 63% (38/60), with 27% (16/60) being of grade 3 or higher. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were less frequent in patients treated with NIVO3 + IPI1 compared with those treated with NIVO1 + IPI3 (12% versus 44%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, the prescribing patterns of NIVO + IPI in very elderly patients are heterogeneous in terms of the dosing regimen and line of treatment. The safety profile of NIVO + IPI is reassuring; whether or not the low-dose regimen NIVO3 + IPI1 should be preferred over NIVO1 + IPI3 in patients aged 80 years or older remains an open question.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article