Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison analysis of two different types of endoscopic resection procedures in small gastric subepithelial tumours originating frommuscularis propria.
Liu, Zhaohui; Lin, Runhua; Wu, Ruinuan; Li, Rui.
Afiliação
  • Liu Z; The Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
  • Lin R; The Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China.
  • Wu R; The Department of Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
  • Li R; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Immunopathology, Shantou, China.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 59(2): 213-217, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698190
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria, there is no uniform standard for selecting the best endoscopic resection method.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) and endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) for small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria to determine which method is more suitable for these tumours.

METHODS:

The data from small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria treated from Jan 2020 to Dec 2022 were collected. A total of 34 eligible patients were enrolled. Sixteen of these patients were treated with ESR-C, and eighteen were treated with ESR-EB. The general clinical characteristics, tumour location, tumour size,growth pattern,operation time, complete resection rate, and complication rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

There was no difference in age, sex, tumour location, tumour size, growth pattern, or histological diagnosis after resection (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time, complete resection rate, or follow-up time (p > 0.05). Eight patients (50.5%) in the ESR-C group had complications (6 perforations and 2 bleeding), and 2 (11.11%) in the ESR-EB group had complications (2 perforations). There were significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.037). All perforations were successfully treated. No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION:

Both ESR-C and ESR-EB are effective and safe in treating small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria. However, ESR-EB can significantly reduce the incidence of complications. ESR-EB is likely a better option for small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article