Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tibialis posterior tendon entrapment in posterior malleolar and pilon injuries of the ankle: a retrospective analysis.
Aamir, Junaid; Syziu, Anxhela; Andritsos, Loukas; Caldwell, Robyn; Mason, Lyndon.
Afiliação
  • Aamir J; Liverpool Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Syziu A; School and Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Andritsos L; Liverpool Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Caldwell R; Liverpool Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Mason L; Liverpool Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. lwmason@liverpool.ac.uk.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(2): 781-787, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698673
BACKGROUND: The Tibialis Posterior tendon (TPT) is the only tendon to encounter the distal tibia and is therefore at greatest risk of injury in fractures of the distal tibia. Although TPT injury has been reported rarely with injuries around the ankle, they often have been missed and present late. AIM: Our aim was to analyse the rate to TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia, i.e. Pilon (PLM) and posterior malleolar fractures (PMF). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PMF and Pilon fractures over an 8-year period was undertaken. Patients who had undergone surgical fixation of their PMF or PLM were identified from 2014 to 2022, using our prospectively collected database. Any fracture which had undergone a preoperative CT was included. Analysis of their pre-operative CT imaging was utilised to identify TPT entrapment, where if < 50% of the tendon cross section was present in the fracture site, this was denoted as a minor entrapment and if ≥ 50% of the tendon was present in the fracture site was denoted as major. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were identified for further analysis, 220 who had a PMF and 143 with PLM injury. The incidence of TPT entrapment was 22% (n = 79) with 64 minor and 15 major entrapments. If the fracture line entered the TPT sheath, there was a 45% rate (72/172) of entrapment as compared to 3.7% (7/190) in fractures not entering the sheath (p < .001). There was no significant difference in TPT entrapment in PMF as compared to PML (p = 0.353). CONCLUSION: In our assessment, we found significant prevalence of 22% of TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia. PMF and PLF had no statistically significant difference in the rate of TPT entrapment. Additionally, we found that there was a significant risk of TPT entrapment when the CT images display the fracture line entering the tendon sheath. We recommend that surgeons consider taking care assessing pre-operative imaging to seek to identify the TPT and to assess intraoperatively where entrapment does occur.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Encarceramento do Tendão / Fraturas do Tornozelo Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Encarceramento do Tendão / Fraturas do Tornozelo Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article