Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the IBD-Control Questionnaire across different sociodemographic and clinical subgroups: secondary analysis of a nationwide electronic survey.
Gebeyehu, Gerum G; Taylor, Frederick; Dobson, Liz; Cummings, J R Fraser; Bloom, Stuart; Kennedy, Nicholas A; Christiansen, Paul; Bodger, Keith.
Afiliação
  • Gebeyehu GG; Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Taylor F; Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Dobson L; IBD Registry Ltd, London, UK.
  • Cummings JRF; IBD Registry Ltd, London, UK.
  • Bloom S; Department of Gastroenteroogy, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Kennedy NA; Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Christiansen P; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Bodger K; Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J Crohns Colitis ; 18(2): 275-285, 2024 Feb 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37706542
BACKGROUND: The IBD-Control Questionnaire is a simple, generic measure of patient-perceived disease control used increasingly in clinical practice and research. We aimed to address knowledge gaps in its psychometric performance, to ensure that it can be used with confidence in a variety of contexts. METHODS: We analysed 7341 responses to the IBD Registry COVID-19 survey, sent to 40 911 patients who completed an online self-assessment tool during the pandemic. Questions covered demographics, comorbidities, inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] sub-type, and IBD-Control Questionnaire and symptom scores [CD-PRO2 or UC-PRO2]. Psychometric properties of IBD-Control-8 were tested overall and within subgroups (Crohn's disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC] and IBD unclassified; male and female; ≤65 and >65 years; number of co-morbidities; deprivation status). RESULTS: Internal consistency was very strong overall [α: 0.84, ω: 0.89] and for each subgroup [α range: 0.81-0.85; ω: 0.86-0.90]. Construct validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation of each item with global rating [VAS] [rs range: 0.47-0.65], strong correlation between IBD-Control-8 score and VAS [rs = 0.74], moderate-to-strong with PRO2 scores [CD: rs = -0.718; UC: rs = -0.602] and significantly higher IBD-Control-8 scores for PRO2-remission vs PRO2-active, consistent across subgroups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor model (items loading onto 'Health-related Quality of Life' [HRQoL] or 'Treatment' domains). Extensive tests for factorial invariance confirmed consistency. CONCLUSIONS: IBD-Control-8 is a psychometrically robust scale which can be used across a range of populations. It offers a quick, reliable, and valid method of assessing patient-perceived control. The construct of 'control' includes traditional HRQoL and a novel domain relating to treatment perception.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Colite Ulcerativa / Doença de Crohn Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Colite Ulcerativa / Doença de Crohn Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article