Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidental findings in computed tomography scans for pediatric trauma patients.
Hassankhani, Amir; Amoukhteh, Melika; Jannatdoust, Payam; Valizadeh, Parya; Johnston, Jennifer H; Gholamrezanezhad, Ali.
Afiliação
  • Hassankhani A; Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Amoukhteh M; Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Jannatdoust P; Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Valizadeh P; Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Johnston JH; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gholamrezanezhad A; Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: ali.gholamrezanezhad@med.usc.edu.
Clin Imaging ; 103: 109981, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37714071
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To quantitatively synthesize and report the frequency and category of incidental findings on Computed Tomography (CT) scans in pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS:

A thorough literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 6, 2023, in adherence to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies describing incidental findings on CT scans in trauma patients ≤21 years were included. Incidental findings were grouped into three categories Category 1 (requiring immediate or urgent evaluation or treatment), Category 2 (likely benign but which may require outpatient follow-up), and Category 3 (benign anatomic variants or pathologic findings that do not require follow-up or intervention).

RESULTS:

Seven studies were included in this study, which revealed a combined rate of 27.10 % of incidental findings with notable heterogeneity among the studies. Aggregated frequencies were 10.15 % for Category 1, 32.18 % for Category 2 and 51.44 % for Category 3. Subgroup meta-analysis on abdominal CT scans showed a higher pooled incidence of incidental findings at 47.17 %, but with lower heterogeneity than the general meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION:

The study underscores the prevalence of incidental findings in pediatric trauma patients undergoing CT scans. The categorization of these findings provides useful information for clinicians in determining appropriate follow-up and management strategies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Achados Incidentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Achados Incidentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article