Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceptions of healthcare professionals regarding labour induction and augmentation: A qualitative systematic review.
Chua, Joelle Yan Xin; Choolani, Mahesh; Lalor, Joan Gabrielle; Yi, Huso; Chong, Yap Seng; Shorey, Shefaly.
Afiliação
  • Chua JYX; Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Choolani M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
  • Lalor JG; School of Nursing and Midwifery Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
  • Yi H; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chong YS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
  • Shorey S; Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: nurssh@nus.edu.sg.
Women Birth ; 37(1): 79-87, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37718194
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Labour induction and augmentation procedures are commonly used in maternity units with or without medical indications. Research shows that healthcare professionals play a significant role in women's childbirth decisions.

AIM:

To consolidate healthcare professionals' perceptions about labour induction and augmentation.

METHODS:

Seven electronic databases were searched from their inception dates till January 2023 PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations, and Theses Global. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines guided this review. Included studies' quality was appraised by the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. Data were thematically synthesised. Review findings were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach.

FINDINGS:

Three main themes were identified from the 17 included studies 1) Making sense of the phenomenon, 2) Two sides of the coin, and 3) The enlightened path ahead.

DISCUSSION:

Healthcare professionals' labour induction and augmentation decisions were affected by personal (knowledge and moral philosophies), and external factors (women, community members, colleagues, and healthcare institutions). Some clinicians were unfamiliar with the proper labour induction/augmentation procedures, while others were worried about their decisions and outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Suggestions for improvement include conducting labour induction/augmentation training for clinicians, having sufficient resources in facilities, and developing appropriate labour induction/augmentation clinical guidelines. Women and their partners, community members, and traditional healers could benefit from receiving labour induction/augmentation education. To improve health outcomes, healthcare professionals could deliver woman-centred care and collaborate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parto / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parto / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article