Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparability of input parameters in the German Retina.net ROP registry and the EU-ROP registry - An exemplary comparison between 2011 and 2021.
Winter, K; Pfeil, J M; Engmann, H; Aisenbrey, S; Lorenz, B; Hufendiek, K; Breuss, H; Khattab, M; Süsskind, D; Kakkassery, V; Lagrèze, W A; Barth, T; Liegl, R; Bründer, M C; Skevas, C; Goldammer, I; Glitz, B; Michalewicz, E; Krohne, T U; Bartmann, I R; Stahl, A.
Afiliação
  • Winter K; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Pfeil JM; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Engmann H; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Aisenbrey S; Department of Ophthalmology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany.
  • Lorenz B; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Giessen and Marburg GmbH Giessen Campus, Giessen, Germany.
  • Hufendiek K; University Eye Hospital, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Breuss H; Department of Ophthalmology, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
  • Khattab M; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Süsskind D; University Eye Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Kakkassery V; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Lagrèze WA; Eye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Barth T; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Liegl R; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Bründer MC; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Skevas C; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Goldammer I; Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany.
  • Glitz B; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany.
  • Michalewicz E; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Krohne TU; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Bartmann IR; Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Fulda, Faculty of Medicine/Campus Fulda, University of Marburg, Fulda, Germany.
  • Stahl A; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 102(3): e314-e321, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37725047
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The German Retina.net ROP registry and its Europe-wide successor, the EU-ROP registry, collect data from patients treated for ROP. This analysis compares input parameters of these two registries to establish a procedure for joint analyses of different registry data using exemplary datasets from the two registries.

METHODS:

Exemplary datasets from the two databases over a 1-year period each (German Retina.net ROP Registry, 2011, 22 infants; EU-ROP Registry, 2021, 44 infants) were compared. The parameters documented in the two databases were aligned and analysed regarding demographic parameters, treatment modalities, complications within first 24 h and retreatments.

RESULTS:

The current analysis showed that data can be aligned for joint analyses with some adjustments within the data structure. The registry with more detailed data collection (EU-ROP) needs to be reduced regarding granularity in order to align the different registries, as the registry with lower granularity determines the level of analyses that can be performed in a comparative approach. In the exemplary datasets, we observed that the overall most common ROP severity in both registries was zone II, 3+ (2011 70.5%; 2021 65%), with decreasing numbers of clock hours showing preretinal neovascularisations (2011 10-12 clock hours in 29% of cases, 2021 4-6 clock hours in 38%). The most prevalent treatment method was laser coagulation in 2011 (75%) and anti-VEGF therapy in 2021 (86.1%). Within the anti-VEGF group, all patients were treated with bevacizumab in 2011 and with ranibizumab in 2021. Retreatment rates were comparable in 2011 and 2021.

CONCLUSION:

Data from two different ROP registries can be aligned and jointly analysed. The analysis reveals a paradigm shift in treatment modalities, from predominantly laser to anti-VEGF, and within the anti-VEGF group from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in Germany. In addition, there was a trend towards earlier treatment in 2021.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retinopatia da Prematuridade / Ranibizumab Limite: Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retinopatia da Prematuridade / Ranibizumab Limite: Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article