Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cross-sectional quality assessment of TikTok content on benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Wong, Hoi Pong Nicholas; So, Wei Zheng; Senthamil Selvan, Vikneshwaren; Lee, Jing Yang; Ho, Collin Elijah Rui Hong; Tiong, Ho Yee.
Afiliação
  • Wong HPN; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. nichwong9@gmail.com.
  • So WZ; Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Senthamil Selvan V; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Lee JY; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ho CERH; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tiong HY; Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
World J Urol ; 41(11): 3051-3057, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728744
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With an increasing reliance on online sources for medical information, we studied the quality and completeness of health literacy videos on TikTok regarding BPH.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional systematic evaluation of TikTok videos using the search term "Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia" was performed on 14th April 2023, and included 49 patient information and educational videos. The videos were then analysed by two reviewers and scored using two instruments the DISCERN instrument and a completeness analysis.

RESULTS:

Of the 49 videos, 38 were created by healthcare professionals (HCPs). The average length of each video was 62.7 ± 59.3 s, with a large average number of total views (24,990.1 ± 109,534.9 views). The DISCERN score trended higher in every category in videos published by HCPs compared to non-HCPs, with HCPs providing a statistically significant increase in reliability (19.0,14.6, p < 0.05) and total score (29.4,23, p < 0.05). Majority of videos were deemed as poor or worse (91.8%) in quality. The completeness of the videos' content was also evaluated across five categories with an average score of 2.53 ± 2.1 out of the maximum 12. The DISCERN scores did not correlate with the degree of completeness of the videos (r = 0.226).

CONCLUSION:

BPH videos on TikTok have a wide reach, but the videos are mostly of low quality and completeness. Future videos should be made with quality and completeness in mind given the large viewership and more can be done to evaluate the extent of BPH misinformation and its impact on patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article