Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of a prediction tool and communication skills training on communication of treatment outcomes: a multicenter stepped wedge clinical trial (the SOURCE trial).
van de Water, L F; Kuijper, S C; Henselmans, I; van Alphen, E N; Kooij, E S; Calff, M M; Beerepoot, L V; Buijsen, J; Eshuis, W J; Geijsen, E D; Havenith, S H C; Heesakkers, F F B M; Mook, S; Muller, K; Post, H C; Rütten, H; Slingerland, M; van Voorthuizen, T; van Laarhoven, H W M; Smets, E M A.
Afiliação
  • van de Water LF; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kuijper SC; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Henselmans I; Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Alphen EN; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kooij ES; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Calff MM; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Beerepoot LV; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Buijsen J; Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Eshuis WJ; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Geijsen ED; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Havenith SHC; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Heesakkers FFBM; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Mook S; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Muller K; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Post HC; Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Rütten H; Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Slingerland M; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Voorthuizen T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Laarhoven HWM; Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands.
  • Smets EMA; Department of Surgery, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
EClinicalMedicine ; 64: 102244, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37781156
Background: For cancer patients to effectively engage in decision making, they require comprehensive and understandable information regarding treatment options and their associated outcomes. We developed an online prediction tool and supporting communication skills training to assist healthcare providers (HCPs) in this complex task. This study aims to assess the impact of this combined intervention (prediction tool and training) on the communication practices of HCPs when discussing treatment options. Methods: We conducted a multicenter intervention trial using a pragmatic stepped wedge design (NCT04232735). Standardized Patient Assessments (simulated consultations) using cases of esophageal and gastric cancer patients, were performed before and after the combined intervention (March 2020 to July 2022). Audio recordings were analyzed using an observational coding scale, rating all utterances of treatment outcome information on the primary outcome-precision of provided outcome information-and on secondary outcomes-such as: personalization, tailoring and use of visualizations. Pre vs. post measurements were compared in order to assess the effect of the intervention. Findings: 31 HCPs of 11 different centers in the Netherlands participated. The tool and training significantly affected the precision of the overall communicated treatment outcome information (p = 0.001, median difference 6.93, IQR (-0.32 to 12.44)). In the curative setting, survival information was significantly more precise after the intervention (p = 0.029). In the palliative setting, information about side effects was more precise (p < 0.001). Interpretation: A prediction tool and communication skills training for HCPs improves the precision of treatment information on outcomes in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such interventions on communication in clinical practice and on patient-reported outcomes. Funding: Financial support for this study was provided entirely by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (UVA 2014-7000).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article