Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: An international multi-centered study.
Sedaghat, Ahmad R; Derbarsegian, Armo; Yu, Victor T; Alsayed, Ahmed; Bitner, Benjamin F; Yeom, Brian; Liu, David T; Schneider, Sven; Adams, Sarah M; Houssein, Firas A; Walters, Zoe A; Tripathi, Siddhant; Walker, Victoria L; Singerman, Kyle W; Meier, Josh C; Kim, Raymond; Kuan, Edward C; Alsaleh, Saad; Phillips, Katie M.
Afiliação
  • Sedaghat AR; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Derbarsegian A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Yu VT; Department of Surgery, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
  • Alsayed A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Bitner BF; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, USA.
  • Yeom B; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Liu DT; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Schneider S; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Adams SM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Houssein FA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Walters ZA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Tripathi S; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Walker VL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Singerman KW; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
  • Meier JC; Department of Surgery, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
  • Kim R; Nevada ENT and Hearing Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
  • Kuan EC; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Alsaleh S; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, USA.
  • Phillips KM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788156
BACKGROUND: Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred. RESULTS: A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred. CONCLUSION: Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article