Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cardiovascular Risk in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists or a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist.
Crawford, E David; Hafron, Jason M; Debruyne, Frans; Wallis, Christopher; Chang, Steven; Garnick, Marc B.
Afiliação
  • Crawford ED; University of California San Diego, Koman Family Outpatient Pavilion, San Diego, California.
  • Hafron JM; Michigan Institute of Urology, Troy, Michigan.
  • Debruyne F; Andros Clinics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • Wallis C; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Chang S; Xelay Acumen Group, Inc, San Mateo, California.
  • Garnick MB; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Urol ; 211(1): 63-70, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796473
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists are believed to have higher cardiovascular risk relative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. However, previous studies have not consistently demonstrated this. We used real-world clinical practice data to evaluate differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk between LHRH agonists compared to a GnRH antagonist following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of data in the Decision Resources Group (now Clarivate) Real World Evidence repository, which represents >300 million US patients from 1991 to 2020 across all US regions. Patients with prostate cancer who received at least 1 injection of ADT were included. The risks of MACE and all-cause mortality as independent endpoints were evaluated, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and associations between MACE and all available confounding risk factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

RESULTS:

A total of 45,059 men with prostate cancer treated with ADT were analyzed. Overall, the risks of MACE and all-cause mortality were slightly lower in the first year after ADT initiation compared to subsequent years. MACE risk was higher for the GnRH antagonist compared to LHRH agonists (HR=1.62; 95% CI 1.21-2.18, P = .001). The risk of all-cause mortality was also higher for the GnRH antagonist vs LHRH agonists (HR=1.87; 95% CI 1.39-2.51, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The adjusted incidence of MACE was higher for men treated with the GnRH antagonist compared to the LHRH agonists. The demographic and risk factors with the greatest impact on MACE risk were higher age, baseline metastasis, oncology (vs urology) setting, personal MACE history, antagonist (vs agonist), tobacco history, White (vs Black) race, and lower BMI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Doenças Cardiovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Doenças Cardiovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article