Accuracy of intra-arterial line transducer levelling practice in a general intensive care unit.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The intra-arterial line is a common device intervention used in the intensive care environment to provide continuous blood pressure measurement. The transducer line is levelled to the patient's phlebostatic axis to provide accurate measurements. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate registered nurses' accuracy at levelling the transducer to the correct anatomical position using visual judgement, compared to one done using a laser level. METHODS: Patient transducers were levelled by visual judgement and then by using a laser level. Time and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded with each measurement along with any difference in transducer level between the two methods and subsequent changes in inotrope administration. RESULTS: A total of 577 MAP measurements were recorded from 178 patients; 70% of observations had a difference in transducer level, 30% of the time the inotrope rate was increased and 18% of the time the inotrope rate was reduced. The prevalence of clinically significant observations with an absolute difference of 50 mm or more in transducer placement was 25%. The mean difference in MAP measurements when a cut-off of 64 mmHg or more for laser was applied to the data was 0.22 (95% confidence interval -0.14, 0.58, n = 513, p = 0.23), and for a cut-off of less than 64 for laser, a larger mean difference of 4.36 (95% confidence interval 3.75, 5.28], n = 64, p < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transducers were unable to be accurately levelled for haemodynamic monitoring using visual means alone. Over the range of patient MAP values examined, 25% of all observations had a clinically significant absolute difference of 50 mm or more in the transducer level position between the two methods. The visual method became increasingly inaccurate and unreliable at low MAP levels requiring medical intervention.