Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical Specialty Impacts Quality of Operative Training in Carotid Endarterectomy.
Weissler, E Hope; Williams, Zachary F; Waldrop, Heather W; Long, Chandler A; Tanious, Adam; Kim, Young.
Afiliação
  • Weissler EH; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Williams ZF; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Waldrop HW; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Long CA; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Tanious A; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  • Kim Y; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC. Electronic address: y.kim@duke.edu.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 99: 298-304, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852361
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently performed by multiple surgical specialties. The impact of surgical specialty and operative volume on post-CEA outcomes has been well described. However, it is unclear whether trainees of different surgical specialties have similar quality of operative training.

METHODS:

Data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education annual reports were collected and compared between graduating vascular surgery (VS) residents, VS fellows, and neurological surgery (NS) residents. Only cases reported as chief/senior/lead resident, surgeon junior, or surgeon fellow were included in analysis. Linear regression analysis was utilized to evaluate trends in case-mix and volume.

RESULTS:

From 2013 to 2022, total CEA case volume was higher among VS residents and fellows, compared to NS residents (52.8 ± 0.8 vs. 44.3 ± 1.4 vs. 12.9 ± 0.6, P < 0.0001). Additionally, VS residents and fellows performed other carotid operations including transfemoral or transcarotid artery stenting (11.1 ± 0.9 vs. 11.2 ± 0.8 vs. 0), carotid body tumor resection (0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.0 vs. 0), and extracranial cervical bypass (6.7 ± 0.3 vs. 6.3 ± 0.3 vs. 0) that were not reported by the NS resident cohort (P < 0.0001 each). On linear regression analysis, total CEA procedures did not change for VS residents (R2 = 0.03, P = 0.62), decreased for VS fellows (-1.29 cases/yr, R2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001), and decreased among NS residents (-0.41 cases/yr, R2 = 0.44, P = 0.01) over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although residents of multiple surgical specialties are trained in CEA, vascular training offers significantly greater numbers and diversity of extracranial carotid cases. It also appears that CEA volume is decreasing among neurosurgical trainees. In light of recent reports on the volume-outcome effect in carotid surgery, these data may have implications for future practice patterns in the domain of extracranial carotid artery disease.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article