Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High genetic merit dairy heifers grazing low quality forage had similar weight gain and urinary nitrogen excretion to those of low genetic merit heifers.
Cheng, L; Goulven, C L; Cullen, B R; Clark, C; Gregorini, P; Sun, X Z; Talukder, S.
Afiliação
  • Cheng L; Faculty of Science, School of Food, Agriculture and Ecosystems Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Goulven CL; Higher Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry, Horticulture and Land Management Agrocampus Ouest, Rennes, France.
  • Cullen BR; Faculty of Science, School of Food, Agriculture and Ecosystems Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Clark C; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Gregorini P; Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
  • Sun XZ; The Innovation Centre of Ruminant Precision Nutrition and Smart Farming, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University, Jilin, China.
  • Talukder S; AgResearch Ltd., Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand.
Front Vet Sci ; 10: 1234872, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37869497
Climate variability and increasing drought events have become significant concerns in recent years. However, there is limited published research on body weight (BW) change of dairy heifers with different genetic merit when grazing on drought impacted pastures in southern Australia. Achieving target body weight (BW) is vital for dairy heifers, especially during critical stages like mating and calving. This study aimed to assess dry matter (DM) intake, BW change, urinary nitrogen excretion, and grazing behaviours of high vs. low genetic dairy heifers grazing pasture during a 43-day experimental period in a drought season. Forty-eight Holstein Friesian heifers grazed on ryegrass-dominant pasture and were divided into two groups based on their high and low Balanced Performance Index (HBPI and LBPI, respectively). Each group was further stratified into six plots, with similar BW, resulting in four heifers per replication group. Data from the five measurement days were averaged for individual cows to analyse the dry matter intake, nitrogen intake and nitrogen excretion. The statistical model included the treatment effect of BPI (H and L) and means were analysed using ANOVA. The pasture quality was poor, with metabolizable energy 9.3 MJ/Kg DM and crude protein 5.9% on a DM basis. Nitrogen intake and urinary nitrogen excretion were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in HBPI compared to the LBPI. However, despite these differences, the study did not find any advantages of having HBPI heifer grazing on low quality forage in terms of BW performance.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article