Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accurate Quantum Chemical Reaction Energies for Lithium-Mediated Electrolyte Decomposition and Evaluation of Density Functional Approximations.
Debnath, Sibali; Neufeld, Verena A; Jacobson, Leif D; Rudshteyn, Benjamin; Weber, John L; Berkelbach, Timothy C; Friesner, Richard A.
Afiliação
  • Debnath S; Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.
  • Neufeld VA; Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.
  • Jacobson LD; Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
  • Rudshteyn B; Schrödinger, Inc., Portland, Oregon 97204, United States.
  • Weber JL; Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.
  • Berkelbach TC; Schrödinger, Inc., New York, New York 10036, United States.
  • Friesner RA; Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.
J Phys Chem A ; 127(44): 9178-9184, 2023 Nov 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878768
ABSTRACT
An important concern related to the performance of Li-ion batteries is the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase on the surface of the anode. This film is formed from the decomposition of electrolytes and can have important effects on the stability and performance. Here, we evaluate the decomposition pathway of ethylene carbonate and related organic electrolyte molecules using a series of density functional approximations and correlated wave function (WF) methods, including the coupled-cluster theory with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)] and auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC). We find that the transition state barrier associated with ring opening varies widely across different functionals, ranging from 3.01 to 17.15 kcal/mol, which can be compared to the value of 12.84 kcal/mol predicted by CCSD(T). This large variation underscores the importance of benchmarking against accurate WF methods. A performance comparison of all of the density functionals used in this study reveals that the M06-2X-D3 (a meta-hybrid GGA), CAM-B3LYP-D3 (a range-separated hybrid), and B2GP-PLYP-D3 (a double hybrid) perform the best, with average errors of about 1.50-1.60 kcal/mol compared to CCSD(T). We also compared the performance of the WF methods that are more scalable than CCSD(T), finding that DLPNO-CCSD(T) and phaseless AFQMC with a DFT trial wave function exhibit average errors of 1.38 and 1.74 kcal/mol, respectively.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article