Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic models predicting transition to psychotic disorder using blood-based biomarkers: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Byrne, Jonah F; Mongan, David; Murphy, Jennifer; Healy, Colm; FÓ§cking, Melanie; Cannon, Mary; Cotter, David R.
Afiliação
  • Byrne JF; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. jonahbyrne21@rcsi.ie.
  • Mongan D; SFI FutureNeuro Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. jonahbyrne21@rcsi.ie.
  • Murphy J; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Healy C; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • FÓ§cking M; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Cannon M; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Cotter DR; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Transl Psychiatry ; 13(1): 333, 2023 Oct 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898606
ABSTRACT
Accumulating evidence suggests individuals with psychotic disorder show abnormalities in metabolic and inflammatory processes. Recently, several studies have employed blood-based predictors in models predicting transition to psychotic disorder in risk-enriched populations. A systematic review of the performance and methodology of prognostic models using blood-based biomarkers in the prediction of psychotic disorder from risk-enriched populations is warranted. Databases (PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO) were searched for eligible texts from 1998 to 15/05/2023, which detailed model development or validation studies. The checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) was used to guide data extraction from eligible texts and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the studies. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was performed. Seventeen eligible studies were identified 16 eligible model development studies and one eligible model validation study. A wide range of biomarkers were assessed, including nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and lipids. The range of C-index (area under the curve) estimates reported for the models was 0.67-1.00. No studies assessed model calibration. According to PROBAST criteria, all studies were at high risk of bias in the analysis domain. While a wide range of potentially predictive biomarkers were identified in the included studies, most studies did not account for overfitting in model performance estimates, no studies assessed calibration, and all models were at high risk of bias according to PROBAST criteria. External validation of the models is needed to provide more accurate estimates of their performance. Future studies which follow the latest available methodological and reporting guidelines and adopt strategies to accommodate required sample sizes for model development or validation will clarify the value of including blood-based biomarkers in models predicting psychosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Biomarcadores Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Biomarcadores Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article