Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between Clinician-Level Factors and Patient Outcomes in Virtual and In-Person Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Multilevel Analysis.
Welsh, Justine W; Sitar, Siara I; Parks, Michael J; Patton, Samantha C; Braughton, Jacqueline E; Waller, Lance A; Ngo, Quyen M.
Afiliação
  • Welsh JW; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Sitar SI; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Parks MJ; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
  • Patton SC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Braughton JE; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
  • Waller LA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Ngo QM; Butler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.
JMIR Hum Factors ; 10: e48701, 2023 11 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37921853
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of virtual treatment services increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, large-scale research on virtual treatment for substance use disorder (SUD), including factors that may influence outcomes, has not advanced with the rapidly changing landscape.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to evaluate the link between clinician-level factors and patient outcomes in populations receiving virtual and in-person intensive outpatient services.

METHODS:

Data came from patients (n=1410) treated in a virtual intensive outpatient program (VIOP) and an in-person intensive outpatient program (IOP), who were discharged between January 2020 and March 2021 from a national treatment organization. Patient data were nested by treatment providers (n=58) examining associations with no-shows and discharge with staff approval. Empathy, comfort with technology, perceived stress, resistance to change, and demographic covariates were examined at the clinician level.

RESULTS:

The VIOP (ß=-5.71; P=.03) and the personal distress subscale measure (ß=-6.31; P=.003) were negatively associated with the percentage of no-shows. The VIOP was positively associated with discharges with staff approval (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.50-3.76). Clinician scores on perspective taking (ß=-9.22; P=.02), personal distress (ß=-9.44; P=.02), and male clinician gender (ß=-6.43; P=.04) were negatively associated with in-person no-shows. Patient load was positively associated with discharge with staff approval (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, patients in the VIOP had fewer no-shows and a higher rate of successful discharge. Few clinician-level characteristics were significantly associated with patient outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand the relationships among factors such as clinician gender, patient load, personal distress, and patient retention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article