Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vaginal erbium laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: A multicenter randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.
O'Reilly, Barry A; Viereck, Volker; Phillips, Christian; Toozs-Hobson, Philip; Kuhn, Annette; Athanasiou, Stavros; Lukanovic, Adolf; Palmer, Brendan; Dahly, Darren; Daykan, Yair; Cardozo, Linda.
Afiliação
  • O'Reilly BA; Department of Urogynecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Viereck V; Bladder and Pelvic Floor Center/Urogynecology, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
  • Phillips C; Women's Health Unit, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.
  • Toozs-Hobson P; Urogynecology Department, Birmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Kuhn A; Women's Clinic/Clinic for Gynecology, Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Athanasiou S; Department of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Surgery, Alexandra University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Lukanovic A; Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Palmer B; Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Dahly D; Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Daykan Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
  • Cardozo L; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 1184-1194, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927157
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative vaginal Er:YAG laser device in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter blinded randomized sham-controlled trial in which women with urodynamic SUI were randomization to active arm using Er:YAG laser therapy, and sham arm using sham handpiece. Patients received two treatments 1 month apart. The primary outcomes measure was 1 h pad weight test measured at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were durability of treatment success at 12 months, and questionnaires for assessment of SUI severity (ICIQ-UI SF), sexual function (PISQ-12) and HRQoL (KHQ), and incidence and severity of device related adverse events and pain (VAS). RESULTS: A total of 110 participants with SUI were recruited; 73 in the active arm and 37 in the sham arm. Two participants were excluded; one was assigned the wrong treatment and one withdrew their consent. Treatment success was observed in 36% of the sham arm and 59% of the active arm; in the latter, odds of achieving treatment success were more than three-fold higher (OR 3.63, 95% CI: 1.3-11.2, P = 0.02). HRQoL by KHQ showed significant improvement in the active versus the sham arm (OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15-0.87, P = 0.003). Similarly, subjective patient assessment of general and sexual function improvement with PISQ-12 and PGI-I showed superior effect over sham (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-7.0, P = 0.02 and OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.36, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Non-ablative vaginal Er:YAG laser therapy significantly improves SUI symptoms versus sham treatment. Er:YAG laser therapy should be considered as a non-surgical treatment option for SUI patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Lasers de Estado Sólido Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Lasers de Estado Sólido Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article